On 12th and 13th August 1883, an astronomer at a small
observatory in Zacatecas in Mexico made an extraordinary observation. José
Bonilla counted some 450 objects, each surrounded by a kind of mist, passing
across the face of the Sun.
Bonilla published his account of this event in a French
journal called L’Astronomie in 1886. Unable to account for the phenomenon, the
editor of the journal suggested, rather incredulously, that it must have been
caused by birds, insects or dust passing front of the Bonilla’s telescope.
(Since then, others have adopted Bonilla’s observations as the first evidence
of UFOs.)
Today, Hector Manterola at the National Autonomous
University of Mexico in Mexico City, and a couple of pals, give a different
interpretation. They think that Bonilla must have been seeing fragments of a
comet that had recently broken up. This explains the ‘misty’ appearance of the
pieces and why they were so close together.
But there’s much more that Manterola and co have deduced.
They point out that nobody else on the planet seems to have seen this comet
passing in front of the Sun, even though the nearest observatories in those
days were just a few hundred kilometers away.
That can be explained using parallax. If the fragments were
close to Earth, parallax would have ensured that they would not have been in
line with the Sun even for observers nearby. And since Mexico is at the same
latitude as the Sahara, northern India and south-east Asia, it’s not hard to
imagine that nobody else was looking.
Manterola and pals have used this to place limits on how
close the fragments must have been: between 600 km and 8000 km of Earth. That’s
just a hair’s breadth.
What’s more, Manterola and co estimate that these objects
must have ranged in size from 50 to 800 metres across and that the parent comet
must originally have tipped the scales at a billion tons or more, that’s huge,
approaching the size of Halley’s comet.
That’s an eye opening reexamination of the data. Astronomers
have seen a number of other comets fragment. The image above shows the
Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 comet which broke apart as it reentered the inner Solar
System in 2006. There’s no reason why such fragments couldn’t pass close by
Earth.
One puzzle is why nobody else saw this comet. It must have
been particularly dull to have escaped observation before and after its close
approach. However, Manterola and co suggest that it may have been a comet
called Pons-Brooks seen that same year by American astronomers.
Manterola and co end their paper by spelling out just how
close Earth may have come to catastrophe that day. They point out that Bonilla
observed these objects for about three and a half hours over two days. This
implies an average of 131 objects per hour and a total of 3275 objects in the
time between observations.
Each fragment was at least as big as the one thought to have
hit Tunguska. Manterola and co end with this: “So if they had collided with
Earth we would have had 3275 Tunguska events in two days, probably an
extinction event.”
A sobering thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment